Affiliate disclosure: This article contains Amazon affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, Glowstice earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you. Our editorial recommendations are independent of these partnerships. Learn more · How we evaluate products
Quick Picks
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
| Product | Price | Link |
|---|---|---|
Best Overall NuFACE Trinity+ Facial Toning Device | ~$395 | Shop Now → |
Best Budget Entry NuFACE MINI+ Facial Toning Device | ~$250 | Shop Now → |
Best App Experience FOREO Bear 2 Microcurrent Facial Device | ~$240 | Shop Now → |
Prices last checked on October 16, 2026 and rounded to the dollar. Amazon prices change often; the price shown at checkout is the one that applies.
A few years ago, consumer microcurrent was essentially synonymous with NuFace. Today the category has matured into a competitive market with meaningfully different products. Ziip Halo pairs nanocurrent with microcurrent and an app-guided treatment library. Foreo Bear 2 combines T-Sonic massage with microcurrent and adjusts its output to your skin. NuFace has replaced the original Trinity with the Trinity+. All three have genuine merit. This comparison helps you decide where in the price and feature range makes sense for your goals.
The Contenders at a Glance
Before diving into individual reviews, here's the market landscape. Prices are approximate and change often.
NuFace Mini+ (about $250): NuFace's compact device, with three intensity levels. FDA cleared, from the brand with the longest track record in consumer microcurrent.
NuFace Trinity+ (about $395): NuFace's flagship, which replaced the original Trinity. Three frequencies, three intensities and a Boost button. FDA cleared. NuFace publishes more (manufacturer-sponsored) data than anyone else in the category.
Ziip Halo (about $400): Delivers both nanocurrent (a lower current than conventional microcurrent) and microcurrent, with treatments run from the Ziip app.
Foreo Bear 2 (about $240 on Amazon): Combines T-Sonic facial massage with microcurrent, with adjustable intensity and an Anti-Shock System that reads skin resistance to avoid zaps. The Foreo app adds guided routines.
NuFace Trinity+ ($395) — The Standard Bearer
NuFace's Trinity+ (the successor to the original Trinity) remains the reference point for consumer microcurrent, mainly because NuFace has the most publicly available (manufacturer-sponsored) clinical data and the longest consumer track record.
Key specs: three frequencies and three intensities, plus a Boost button that NuFace says adds up to 25% more power. FDA cleared. It needs a conductive gel, such as NuFace's Aqua Gel Activator.
What works well: The adjustable intensity lets beginners start low and increase as they get used to it. The spherical probes cover large face areas efficiently. The routine is straightforward without the app, though NuFace offers one with guided routines.
Limitations: You hold the device, move it across the face with specific strokes, and track time yourself unless you use the app. Activator gel is a recurring cost. The device gives no feedback on how well current is flowing.
Best for: Those who want the most established consumer microcurrent device with the clearest evidence trail and a straightforward routine. Also a sensible first device for anyone who wants to find out whether microcurrent works for them.
Related Reading
Editor's Product Picks
Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

NuFACE MINI+ Facial Toning Device
~$250
Sold by Front Row Group, a third-party sellerShop Now →
NuFACE Trinity+ Facial Toning Device
~$395
Sold by Front Row Group, a third-party sellerShop Now →
Ziip Halo Microcurrent + Nanocurrent Device
Price varies
No single listing we could verify, so this opens an Amazon search of third-party sellers. Check the seller before you buy.Shop Now →
FOREO Bear 2 Microcurrent Facial Device
What to look for — not a specific product~$240 typical range
Sold by FOREO, a third-party sellerShop Now →Prices last checked on October 16, 2026 and rounded to the dollar. Amazon prices change often; the price shown at checkout is the one that applies.
Ziip Halo (about $400) — The Premium Science-Forward Option
Ziip was founded by aesthetician Melanie Simon and sets itself apart with nanocurrent, delivered alongside conventional microcurrent. The rationale: nanocurrent may more closely match the body's own bioelectrical signalling. Ziip's claims for it (such as supporting collagen) come from the company rather than independent trials.
Key specs: nanocurrent plus microcurrent in one device, with treatments run from the Ziip app. Ziip sells its own conductive gels, including a premium gold gel.
What works well: The app-led treatments take the guesswork out of stroke patterns and timing. The nanocurrent option is a genuine point of difference from NuFace and Foreo.
Limitations: Ziip's gels are proprietary and cost more than generic alternatives, so running costs add up. Independent (non-Ziip) clinical data on the Halo specifically is limited.
Best for: Committed microcurrent users who want the most technology-forward option, value guided treatments, and are comfortable with the premium price and gel costs.
Foreo Bear 2 (about $240) — The App-Native Experience
Foreo's Bear 2 takes a hybrid approach, combining T-Sonic massage with microcurrent. The idea is to use the massage for circulation and puffiness alongside microcurrent for muscle toning.
Key specs: adjustable microcurrent intensity, several T-Sonic massage patterns, and Foreo's Anti-Shock System, which measures skin resistance many times a second and adjusts output so treatment doesn't sting. The Foreo app adds guided routines.
What works well: The Anti-Shock System is a genuine usability feature: it adapts to changing skin conductivity instead of delivering a fixed current. The app's zone-by-zone guidance suits beginners, and the T-Sonic massage gives tactile feedback during use.
Limitations: The T-Sonic massage, while pleasant, has less specific evidence for facial toning than microcurrent itself. The best experience depends on the app.
Best for: Tech-comfortable users who value the app, want the anti-shock skin adaptation, and like the combined massage and microcurrent routine. Also suits those who find NuFace's manual stroke routine too high-maintenance.
Best Budget Pick: NuFace Mini+ ($250)
For those wanting to enter the microcurrent category without paying for a flagship like the Trinity+, Ziip Halo or Bear 2, the NuFace Mini+ is the clearest recommendation.
NuFace describes the Mini+ as delivering full-strength microcurrent in a smaller body, with three intensity levels. Its compact size suits contour areas (jawline, under the cheekbones) where precision matters more than coverage speed.
The Mini+ is FDA cleared and comes with NuFace's Aqua Gel Activator. For targeted eye and lip work, NuFace sells a separate device, the FIX MicroWand.
For users at the start of their microcurrent journey, the Mini+ is a lower-cost way to find out whether the technology produces visible results for them before buying a flagship.
Head-to-Head: Key Specifications
Technology: - NuFace Mini+: microcurrent, 3 intensities - NuFace Trinity+: microcurrent, 3 frequencies and 3 intensities, Boost button - Ziip Halo: nanocurrent + microcurrent - Foreo Bear 2: microcurrent + T-Sonic massage, Anti-Shock System
Brands publish their current specifications in different ways, so microamp figures aren't directly comparable across devices.
FDA clearance: NuFace's devices are FDA cleared. Check each brand's current clearance on its own site before buying.
App: NuFace (optional), Ziip (central to the guided treatments), Foreo (adds guided routines).
Conductive gel: All three brands' devices need a gel or activator. Ziip sells its own gels; NuFace includes its Aqua Gel Activator.
Session time: All three recommend short daily sessions to start. NuFace and Ziip give per-zone stroke routines; the Foreo app provides guided timing.
Clinical evidence: NuFace has the most published data, though it's manufacturer-sponsored. Ziip relies on company data plus general nanocurrent literature. Independent studies for all three are limited.
Final Verdict
Best overall for evidence and ease: NuFace Trinity+. The standard for consumer microcurrent, with the most published (if manufacturer-sponsored) data and a straightforward routine.
Best premium for technology depth: Ziip Halo. The nanocurrent and microcurrent combination and guided app treatments make it the most technology-forward option if budget and gel costs are secondary.
Best for app-native users: Foreo Bear 2. The most integrated app experience, T-Sonic massage and adaptive Anti-Shock current make it the choice for users who want the most guidance.
Best budget entry: NuFace Mini+. FDA cleared, proven technology and a lower upfront cost, so you can find out whether microcurrent works for your face before buying a flagship.
All of these devices can produce visible results when used correctly and consistently. The differences between them in outcomes are likely smaller than their marketing suggests.
Author
Glowstice Editorial
The Glowstice editorial team consists of skincare researchers, cosmetic chemists, and science writers dedicated to translating peer-reviewed dermatology into practical guidance for curious consumers.

